Difference between revisions of "Flexure Characterization and Design"
Philip Dames (talk | contribs) |
Philip Dames (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Current Design= |
=Current Design= |
||
The flexures currently on the PPOD are made of a 1/4" Tygon tubing glued to aluminum mounts. Different lengths have been used in the past, varying from 0.5" to 1" of exposed tubing and overall the plate behavior is easier to control, especially at high amplitudes, with shorter flexures. |
|||
The flexures currently on the PPOD are made of a 1/4" Tygon tubing glued to aluminum mounts. |
|||
=Hardware= |
=Hardware= |
||
There are three basic pieces of hardware needed to characterize a flexure: a forcing mechanism that can move in all six degrees of freedom, accelerameters to collect motion data, and a six-axis force sensor to collect the forces and moments. The PPOD was used to force the flexures because it did not require building a separate system, it already collects acceleration data of the plate, and it can control motion in all six degrees of motion at frequencies and amplitudes that flexures will be used at. |
There are three basic pieces of hardware needed to characterize a flexure: a forcing mechanism that can move in all six degrees of freedom, accelerameters to collect motion data, and a six-axis force sensor to collect the forces and moments. The PPOD was used to force the flexures because it did not require building a separate system, it already collects acceleration data of the plate, and it can control motion in all six degrees of motion at frequencies and amplitudes that flexures will be used at. |
||
==Force Sensor mount== |
==Force Sensor mount== |
||
In order to attach the flexure and force sensor to the PPOD, we had to design a detachable mounting system. |
In order to attach the flexure and force sensor to the PPOD, we had to design a detachable mounting system. To make it light enough that the PPOD would not have much difficulty in controlling it, the arms were made from aluminum honeycomb and glued in the center to an aluminum plate where the force sensor attaches. This central plate is to make the mount more rigid as the arms are separate pieces. Three C-clamps are used to attach the mount to the PPOD plate, one at the end of each arm. |
||
==Force Sensor== |
|||
The force sensor used is an ATI Industrial Automation Mini 40 Force/Torque Sensor, model US-10-20. The data sheet can be directly seen [http://www.ati-ia.com/app_content/documents/9610-05-1017%20DAQ.pdf here] or found on [http://www.ati-ia.com/products/ft/ft_models.aspx?id=Mini40 ATI's website]. |
|||
==Rigid Mount== |
|||
The free end of the flexure must be mounted to a rigid body in order to measure the force the flexure is applying to the plate. This is currently a large T of steel that fits over the PPOD and the plate that the flexure is mounted to can be clamped to the bar. The height and position of the plate can be adjusted by adding spacers between the plate and the mount. In the future I hope to add a more user-friendly mounting system for the rigid mount. |
|||
=Data Collection= |
=Data Collection= |
Revision as of 16:53, 10 June 2009
Overview
Flexures are deformable solid bodies used to connect elements in a mechanical system. This flexibility allows for greater freedom of motion of the parts relative to each other than a rigid joint does, but at the cost of complicating the dynamics of the system. As one can imagine, it is important to know the properties of the flexures in order to predict and control the behavior of a system. This project is primarily focused on the flexures used in the PPOD projects in LIMS which are used to connect the linear actuators to the table. In this case the flexures allow the table to move in all six degrees of freedom (three translational and three rotational) which the use of rigid joints would not allow. The goals of this project are to be able to test the performance of the existing flexures and to use this information to design new ones to improve the performance of the PPOD.
Current Design
The flexures currently on the PPOD are made of a 1/4" Tygon tubing glued to aluminum mounts. Different lengths have been used in the past, varying from 0.5" to 1" of exposed tubing and overall the plate behavior is easier to control, especially at high amplitudes, with shorter flexures.
Hardware
There are three basic pieces of hardware needed to characterize a flexure: a forcing mechanism that can move in all six degrees of freedom, accelerameters to collect motion data, and a six-axis force sensor to collect the forces and moments. The PPOD was used to force the flexures because it did not require building a separate system, it already collects acceleration data of the plate, and it can control motion in all six degrees of motion at frequencies and amplitudes that flexures will be used at.
Force Sensor mount
In order to attach the flexure and force sensor to the PPOD, we had to design a detachable mounting system. To make it light enough that the PPOD would not have much difficulty in controlling it, the arms were made from aluminum honeycomb and glued in the center to an aluminum plate where the force sensor attaches. This central plate is to make the mount more rigid as the arms are separate pieces. Three C-clamps are used to attach the mount to the PPOD plate, one at the end of each arm.
Force Sensor
The force sensor used is an ATI Industrial Automation Mini 40 Force/Torque Sensor, model US-10-20. The data sheet can be directly seen here or found on ATI's website.
Rigid Mount
The free end of the flexure must be mounted to a rigid body in order to measure the force the flexure is applying to the plate. This is currently a large T of steel that fits over the PPOD and the plate that the flexure is mounted to can be clamped to the bar. The height and position of the plate can be adjusted by adding spacers between the plate and the mount. In the future I hope to add a more user-friendly mounting system for the rigid mount.
Data Collection
Transfer Function Fitting
Until now, only a simple approximation has been used to describe the flexures when modeling the system. In reality, a flexure will have a mass, damping, and spring matrix associated with it that maps its motion to the forces it applies.
Here is a vector of forces and moments and is a vector of coordinates. This leads to a transfer function from input acceleration to output force given by:
We then have to fit this model to each combination of the accelerations and forces for a total of 36 transfer functions, one for each entry in the mass, damping, and spring matrices. For this we used the MATLAB code found below.